Abstrak
Debate over 1 Timothy 2:8-15 typically centers on verses 11-12, detaching the teaching prohibition from an argument that also regulates clothing, adornment, silence, creation order, Eve's deception, and childbearing. This article examines how the memory of Eve binds modesty, voice, authority, and reproduction into a coherent gender order. Combining historical-critical exegesis, feminist criticism, gender discourse analysis, and intertextual reading of Genesis 2-3, the study analyzes the Greek text in relation to Greco-Roman household structures and the dynamics of the pastoral epistles. Eve functions as regulative memory: a past figure selectively configured to supply a transhistorical foundation for ordering women's bodies. The creation order articulates precedence, Eve's deception links gender to epistemic vulnerability, and childbearing directs women's future toward the household. These are not four separate issues but one politics of the body. Comparison with Genesis and early reception shows this construction is an interpretive choice, not the only implication of Eve's story. The contribution lies in regulative memory as a device explaining how canonical texts naturalize gender order.
Abstrak
Perdebatan atas 1 Timotius 2:8-15 umumnya terpusat pada ayat 11-12, sehingga larangan mengajar terlepas dari rangkaian argumentasi yang juga mengatur pakaian, perhiasan, keheningan, urutan penciptaan, penipuan Hawa, dan kelahiran anak. Artikel ini menelaah bagaimana memori Hawa menyatukan kesopanan, suara, otoritas, dan reproduksi menjadi satu tata gender yang koheren. Dengan memadukan eksegesis historis-kritis, kritik feminis, analisis wacana gender, dan pembacaan intertekstual Kejadian 2-3, penelitian ini memeriksa teks Yunani 1 Timotius 2:8-15 dalam kaitannya dengan struktur rumah tangga Greko-Romawi dan dinamika Surat-Surat Pastoral. Hawa berfungsi sebagai memori regulatif: figur masa lalu yang dikonfigurasi secara selektif untuk memberikan fondasi transhistoris bagi penataan tubuh perempuan. Urutan penciptaan mengartikulasikan presedensi, penipuan Hawa menautkan gender dengan kerentanan epistemik, dan kelahiran anak mengarahkan masa depan perempuan ke dalam rumah tangga. Keempat regulasi itu bukan masalah terpisah, melainkan satu politik tubuh. Perbandingan dengan kejadian dan resepsi awal menunjukkan bahwa konstruksi gender ini merupakan pilihan interpretatif, bukan satu-satunya implikasi dari kisah Hawa. Kontribusinya terletak pada konsep memori regulatif sebagai perangkat untuk menjelaskan bagaimana teks kanonik menaturalisasi tatanan gender.
Artikel teks lengkap
Referensi
Bassler, Jouette M. “Adam, Eve, and the Pastor: The Use of Genesis 2–3 in the Pastoral Epistles.” In Genesis 1–3 in the History of Exegesis: Intrigue in the Garden, edited by Gregory A. Robbins, 43–65. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1988.
———. “The Widows’ Tale: A Fresh Look at 1 Tim 5:3–16.” Journal of Biblical Literature 103, no. 1 (1984): 23–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3260312.
Grung, Anne Hege. Gender Justice in Muslim-Christian Readings: Christian and Muslim Women in Norway: Making Meaning of Texts from the Bible, the Koran, and the Hadith. Currents of Encounter 53. Leiden: Brill, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004306707.
Holmes, J. M. Text in a Whirlwind: A Critique of Four Exegetical Devices at 1 Timothy 2.9–15. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 196; Studies in New Testament Greek 7. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2000.
Huizenga, Annette Bourland. 1–2 Timothy, Titus. Wisdom Commentary 53. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2016.
Hylen, Susan E. A Modest Apostle: Thecla and the History of Women in the Early Church. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
———. Women in the New Testament World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Jodamus, Johnathan. “(Con)texturing Ideologies of Modesty, Authority, and Childbearing in 1 Timothy 2:8–15.” Journal of Early Christian History 12, no. 3 (2022): 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/2222582X.2022.2146520.
King, Fergus J., and Dorothy A. Lee. “Lost in Translation: Rethinking Words about Women in 1–2 Timothy.” Scottish Journal of Theology 74, no. 1 (2021): 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930621000053.
Klem, Matthew J. “The Fall of Eve and the Fate of Her Daughters: Competing Interpretations of Genesis 3:13 in 1 Timothy and Gregory of Nazianzus.” Harvard Theological Review 118, no. 3 (2025): 504–525. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816025100916.
Köstenberger, Andreas J., and Thomas R. Schreiner, eds. Women in the Church: An Interpretation and Application of 1 Timothy 2:9–15. 3rd ed. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2016.
MacDonald, Margaret Y. Early Christian Women and Pagan Opinion: The Power of the Hysterical Woman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
———. The Pauline Churches: A Socio-Historical Study of Institutionalization in the Pauline and Deutero-Pauline Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Osiek, Carolyn, Margaret Y. MacDonald, and Janet H. Tulloch. A Woman’s Place: House Churches in Earliest Christianity. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2006.
Porter, Stanley E. “What Does It Mean to Be ‘Saved by Childbirth’ (1 Timothy 2:15)?” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 15, no. 49 (1993): 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X9301504906.
Schüssler Fiorenza, Elisabeth. In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins. New York: Crossroad, 1983.
Solevåg, Anna Rebecca. Birthing Salvation: Gender and Class in Early Christian Childbearing Discourse. Biblical Interpretation Series 121. Leiden: Brill, 2013.
Westfall, Cynthia Long. Paul and Gender: Reclaiming the Apostle’s Vision for Men and Women in Christ. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2016.
Winter, Bruce W. Roman Wives, Roman Widows: The Appearance of New Women and the Pauline Communities. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003.
Penulis

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.